12/13/2023 0 Comments Shroud of turin 3d comparison![]() ![]() The carbon dating of the Shroud to 1260 to 1390 AD is explained by neutrons that were apparently included in this radiation. Formation of the image is explained by radiation emitted from within the body that communicated the required information to the Shroud to form the image. Why we can see the image on the Shroud is explained by the presence of information in the pattern of discolored fibers in the image. This is attempted in this paper based on information, radiation, and neutron absorption. To determine whether the Shroud of Turin could be the authentic burial cloth of Jesus, the many mysteries related to the Shroud need to be explained with a logically consistent unbiased evidence-based approach that follows the evidence where it leads. 1 do not constitute valid evidence that the Shroud originated in the 14th century or constitute valid evidence that the Shroud of Turin is not the authentic burial cloth of Jesus. The conclusion of this evaluation is that the experimental results discussed in Ref. ![]() The conclusion also does not necessarily follow from the experimental results because the alleged inconsistencies are more likely to indicate our lack of understanding of the process before, during, and after crucifixion or result from inadequacies in the experimental procedures. This research has led most Shroud researchers to reject the view that the Shroud originated in the 13th or 14th centuries, contrary to the conclusion in Ref. As a result, this evaluation next considers the impact of presuppositions on the results of research, and a summary of previous research on the Shroud of Turin. 1, the alleged contradictions point “against the authenticity of the Shroud itself, suggesting the Turin linen was an artistic or ‘didactic’ representation from the XIV century.” There is nothing in their BPA analysis to indicate the century that the Shroud originated, so the authors evidently based this 14th-century date on their view of previous research on “the historical records, the radiocarbon dating, and the chemical analysis” of the Shroud. As concluded in the last paragraph of Ref. The paper identifies two alleged inconsistencies between the results of the experiments and the blood on the Shroud: 1) the blood on the back of the left hand compared to the forearm, and 2) the blood on the lower back compared to the location of the side wound. This is followed by a description and evaluation of the six experiments involved in the BPA. The main conclusions are then considered, including possible explanations of the alleged inconsistencies. The general problems with this type of analysis and the specific problems with the experimental procedures in Ref. Several elements are included in this evaluation. This paper on BPA of the Shroud is evaluated to determine the soundness of its methods and conclusions. ![]() A “BPA” is a bloodstain pattern analysis. The paper is titled “A BPA Approach to the Shroud of Turin” by Matteo Borrini, Ph.D., and Luigi Garlaschelli, M. This is an evaluation of a paper published July 10, 2018, in the Journal of Forensic Sciences. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |